The questions were wide ranging and topics included:
Choice of site - SITA acknowledged this wasn't ideal, being in the Green Belt and the AONB, and that an industrial site would be better, but this was the result of a long search. They did secure planning permission at a site in Avonmouth but that area is changing rapidly and moving from heavy industry to warehousing. They also agreed a more central location would be preferable, but again argued there was a lack of alternatives.
Back up plans - They are still looking at alternatives and would withdraw this application if a better site became available.
Timing of application - SITA are now looking to put in the planning application towards the end of July.
Enclosing the tunnels in a building - They are reviewing with DEFRA whether they should enclose the tunnels but operationally this wouldn't be as good.
Vermin - Nothing stays still in the open for more than 8 hours, during which time there’d be too much movement of vehicles for animals to want to go on site. There will be baiting stations around the site, it will be fenced and the whole area kept clean.
Odours - The Agrivert spokesman claimed residents wouldn’t even know this site was there.
Bioaerosols - These will be monitored before and after the site is commissioned.
Claire Young asked about:
- The inclusion of cardboard, which isn't treated at Agrivert's Edmonton IVC. Agrivert assured the meeting that they had learnt their lessons at their open windrow site in Oxfordshire, which takes cardboard, although he didn't elaborate on how these lessons would be applied at this site.
- The market for the end product - Agrivert insisted farmers were falling over themselves for the compost.
- Whether the predicted vehicle movements allowed for taking waste from other authorities, which they said it did.
No comments:
Post a Comment